Showing posts with label Local government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Local government. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Tom Dishlevoy's Questions for Town of Comox Candidates...

Cruising through my Facebook "morning news-of-the-world" the other day I found these questions from Comox resident, architect, and regional resident explorer-of-the-future Tom Dishlevoy. He's posed them to all the candidates currently running in the by-election to fill Ray Crossley's seat on the Town of Comox council. A useful use of social media tools, in my opinion.

*Note: I've updated this post to include recent Facebook comments by citizens and by-election candidates.


Tom Dishlevoy's original post:
"Hi all Comox Candidates: How about some comment on the following:
1. A third crossing of the Courtenay River?
2. Approval of low speed electric vehicles in Comox?
3. Daylighting of historic Comox creeks burried in the last 30 years?
4. A continuous waterfront walkway through Town?
5. 4 storey buildings in the downtown core?"

I've expanded this post to include some recent Facebook comments.

Tom Dishlevoy (29.12.2010)
"Here is a question for Pat [McKenna] specifically and the others as well. Do you see any big box stores in the future of Comox? Have you read the Smal-Mart Revolution?"

Brian Charlton (29.12.2010)
"What is their position on the Regional Growth Strategy?

On recording votes of councillers at Council meetings?
For starters."


Derek Bouchard (31.12.2010)
Hi Tom, thanks for the questions... Some quick and unrefined answers...

1. Yes, but for pedestrians and cyclists. (more on this further down)
2. Yes. And other electric vehicles and hybrids. And dedicated parking spots in the downtown core to encourage their use. 
3. This sounds good hypothetically, but I could see a lot of costs and possible problems involved. I would need to see a lot more details on what's involved.
4. Absolutely, linking up with the Courtenay Riverway Walkway. This would involve the third crossing I mentioned in answer 1. If we build an alternative away from regular traffic (Dyke Road), I think a lot more people would use that route, and leave the cars at home.
5. Only on the north side. While I support the principle of densification, I would hate to see streets where the sun never shined. I like how the condos on Comox Ave. are set back from the street, but for commercial on the bottom floor, businesses would want to front onto the sidewalk. I would hate to see the street have the feeling of entering a tunnel.



Nico TeWinkel (01.01.2011)
Hi Tom, sorry I just noticed your questions now. For future discussions, if you could tag my facebook page directly I'll be sure to comment sooner (facebook.com/NicoForComox).

I'm happy to see that I have a lot of these answers in common with Derek!
1. I'm not sure if a river crossing is the best way to solve the problem of traffic. Streets are like storage areas that way - traffic will fill whatever space becomes available, and you'll be faced with problems again in the near future. Congestion of cars does, however, encourage people to use alternative means of transportation. The problem is that the bridges are pretty scary places for cyclists and pedestrians. So my suggestion is to add a dedicated cyclist and pedestrian crossing, as well as safe cyclist and pedestrian routes linking up to it.
2. Absolutely. We also need Courtenay and Area B to sign up to make it work. And we need to put some pressure on the provincial and federal governments (and transport Canada) to allow low-speed electric vehicles to travel at 60 km/hr rather than the current discouraging 40. They claim safety as the reason, but scooters are limited to 60 and are less safe.
3. This is a great idea where-ever possible. Streams are important to wildlife, clean the air, and add a sense of serenity to the surrounding areas.
4. Yes of course. I would also want to see more safe, dedicated cycling and pedestrian routes in general.
5. I'm not a big fan of taller buildings, as they really don't fit Comox as the tourism and retirement destination it currently is. I would vote against them, unless the specific setting happens to be perfectly suited for it.
6. Big box stores do not suit Comox, I will vote against them.
7. Regional Growth Strategy - I'm not sure what the question is, which may mean that I haven't been closely enough involved. In general I feel that growth should be planned for the Valley as a whole, rather than each city and area doing its own thing. Ultimately growth must be planned to make us less, rather than more, dependant on outside resources.
8. Yes - all council actions should be public information, especially the way each councillor is voting, as that's the only way they are really accountable to their voters. The "slightly more democratic" part of my platform is for exactly that reason - use the internet to keep the public informed and involved.


Open Invitation
I invite all candidates to comment here. I also encourage readers and non-candidates to pose their own questions about the future of the Town of Comox, the larger Comox Valley region and how the Town works towards sustainability and better quality of life.

hanspetermeyer
2 January 2011

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Nancy Hofer talks about the City of Courtenay's Greenhouse Gas intiatives (Part 1 of 2)




Nancy Hofer is the Environmental Planner with the City of Courtenay. In this, the first of 2 interviews withhanspetermeyer, she talks about her background and the context for the City's recent changes to its Official Community Plan. These changes reflect work Nancy has been doing with respect to setting Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission targets and programs.
This is part of a series of conversations about conservation and sustainability in the Comox Valley, produced by hanspetermeyer.ca. For more information, visit CV2050.com. To support this conversation, "like" the CV2050 Facebook page at http://on.fb.me/db55pu and/or the Facebook page for the Comox Valley Conservation Strategy at http://on.fb.me/CVCSFB

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Mark Holland responds to #3x2x8

In this, the 2nd of hanspetemeyer's conversations with sustainability practioner Mark Holland, Mark responds to the 3 questions that are at the heart of the #3x2x8 project.




Mark Holland is a principal with the HBLanarc sustainability planning firm (Vancouver/Nanaimo). Mark and his company are currently working with local governments, community organizations, and residents on the Comox Valley Sustainability Strategy. He talks to hanspetermeyer about sustainability planning and community strategies for meeting the future. In this interview Mark answers the #3x2x8 series of questions that are part of the CV2050 "all about sustainability and the Comox Valley" project initiated by hanspetermeyer, David Stapley, and Meaghan Cursons.




(cc) hanspetermeyer.ca / 2009




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, October 26, 2009

What's #3x2x8? .... more about #CV2050

There's a lot of stuff going on in the Comox Valley. Period.

It's a place with plenty of beauty, plenty of energy, and plenty of opportunities. But frankly, with so much going on it's hard to do it all.

I'm working on a project that's related to the Comox Valley Sustainability Strategy (CVSS). My goal is to cut through some of the noise and vagueness around "sustainability." I want to make it real, tangible, and accessible. How am I going to do that? Good question. My answer: #3x2x8.

What's #3x2x8? 
#3x2x8 is the product of some conversations between David Stapley, Meaghan Cursons, and me. We wanted a simple, straightforward way to stimulate and deepen the conversation about sustainability in the Comox Valley. We also wanted something that would sustain and change over the coming months and years as all of us work towards making this place more resilient and thriving home. It looks like this.

3 = 3 questions
2 = 2 community leaders
8 = 8 pillars of sustainability

3 questions...

  1. What part of the Comox Valley Sustainability Strategy excites you?
  2. What will be the challenges in implementing the Sustainability Strategy in the Comox Valley?
  3. In what ways do you think your [pick one point of view]
    • community organization
    • business 
    • local government 
    • neighbourhood .... can work with [pick 1-3]
    • local government 
    • neighbourhoods
    • businesses
    • community organization ... to help create a sustainable Comox Valley?

2 community leaders...

I'm doing video interviews of 16 community leaders (2 leaders x 8 pillars) and posting them to YouTube and Facebook.

How did we make our choices of who to interview? A real challenge in a community as diverse as ours, with so many folks in leadership roles. We plunged in and took a first step, inviting folks who've taken a lead in being involved one of the 8 pillars of "sustainability" in our community. Generally they're members of the CVSS working groups.

See some gaps in our leadership roster? Great! Please take our #3x2x8 template and interview the folks you think were missed. Post them to Facebook or YouTube or VIMEO – and tag them: #CV2050 #3x2x8.


Why are we using the #3x2x8 strategy?
One reason is simplicity. Our 48 responses won't cover all aspects or viewpoints on what sustainability in the Comox Valley is, or what the Comox Valley might look like in the year 2050. But they will start a conversation. And that's where you come in.

Whenever you take this #3x2x8 template and work with it, play with, challenge it, whatever – whenever you do this you're helping us extend and deepen this conversation about sustainability and the Comox Valley.

Maybe you'll use it as a conversation starter at a party. Or maybe youll ask your friends or family members over lunch or dinner. See if one of them wants to do an interview. Take your digital camera, ask the 3 questions, make a little video of your interview with a neighbour – or your son, sister, best friend, boss, or the cute girl at the grocery store. Tag it. Post it.

If you're inclined to write, do a written interview and post it on our Facebook page, or on the "do the #3x2x8 interview" page on our blog here at www.CV2050.com

It's just the beginning...
Just the start of the conversation... and action on sustainability in the Comox Valley
#3x2x8 isn't the end of the conversation about sustainability in the Comox Valley. But I'm hoping that it's a good way to get more people talking and playing with something that's important to me: making this beautiful place I call home an even better place in the decades to come.

hpm
October 26, 2009
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Your opp to do the #3x2x8 interview...

3 questions for community leaders, citizens, taxpayers, neighbours, friends, family....
1. What part of the Comox Valley Sustainability Strategy excites you?
2. What will be the challenges in implementing the Sustainability Strategy in the Comox Valley?
3. In what ways do you think your [pick one point of view]
a) community organizations
b) business
c) local government
d) neighbourhood
can work with [pick 1-3]
a) local government
b) neighbourhood
c) business
d) community organization
to help create a sustainable Comox Valley?

Please use the comment form to add to our #3x2x8 conversation about #CV2050.
It's not about coming up with "the right answer."
It's about contributing to a conversation about the kinds of changes that you, me, everybody in the Comox Valley is going to be going through as we move towards a more sustainable, more prosperous, more thrivable community.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]